什么时候开始写研究论文?在
同时你开始一个研究项目。每个有思想的人都应该读一读这篇文章，并尝试一下这个过程。这太疯狂了!!为什么在你开始一个研究项目之前不这样做呢?

当我们从不开始任何研究项目，我们只是致力于写论文时，衰落和最终的腐败将是决定性的!

什么时候机器人写论文?什么自动造纸机?

当你有话要说的时候，你应该写一篇论文!!

怀特塞兹先生，对不起，但我完全不同意! Maybe you are a prolific professor, but how cited?

Of course you can make a good career still for some few years with this method, but not for long:

Read instead

• LiquidPub Project: Scientific Publications meet the Web, a project from University of Trento
• My letter of resignation from the board of International Journal of Solids and Structures

And read why Google Scholar will silently stop this crazyness

Scientometrics

Vol: 74, Issue: 2, February 2008

pp. 273 - 294

Title:

Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines

Authors:
Kousha, Kayvanb, a; Thelwall, Mikeb, a

Affiliations:
b. University of Tehran, Department of Library and Information Science, Jalal-Al-e-Ahmed Ave.
P.O. Box 11455/6456
Tehran
Iran

a. University of Wolverhampton, School of Computing and Information Technology, Wolverhampton
UK

Abstract (English):

For
practical reasons, bibliographic databases can only contain a subset of
the scientific literature. The ISI citation databases are designed to
cover the highest impact scientific research journals as well as a few
other sources chosen by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI).
Google Scholar also contains citation information, but includes a less
quality controlled collection of publications from different types of
web documents. We define Google Scholar unique citations as those
retrieved by Google Scholar which are not in the ISI database. We took
a sample of 882 articles from 39 open access ISI-indexed journals in
2001 from biology, chemistry, physics and computing and classified the
type, language, publication year and accessibility of the Google
Scholar unique citing sources. The majority of Google Scholar unique
citations (70%) were from full-text sources and there were large
disciplinary differences between types of citing documents, suggesting
that a wide range of non-ISI citing sources, especially from
non-journal documents, are accessible by Google Scholar. This might be
considered to be an advantage of Google Scholar, since it could be
useful for citation tracking in a wider range of open access scholarly
documents and to give a broader type of citation impact. An important
corollary from our study is that Google Scholar’s wider coverage of
Open Access (OA) web documents is likely to give a boost to the impact
of OA research and the OA movement.